On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 01:51, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Yes, the proposal is to use the JavaMail interfaces instead of the
> MailRepository interfaces, which were not in Mailet API until a few weeks
> ago, as you know, and would be rolled out.  However, you appear to be
> missing a key point.

I like the idea of using the JavaMail API for our message store API. I only 
wish that the API was actually defined with "interfaces", and not abstract 
base classes. Would that have been so hard?

-- 
ciao,
Daz

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to