Serge,
Would you mind annotating the buzilla report, and close it if that's what
you feel is correct?
Is there any value in emitting a log entry with the getName() and
getMessageID()? Does that provide any diagnostic value?
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:51
To: James Developers List
Subject: Re: [Bug 16834] smtpserver.log doesn't show Message-ID
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16834
>
> This change would need to be made in multiple components in order to be
> consistent. Right now we use Mail.getName() (typically a local time-based
> value) for logging. Should we use MimeMessage.getMessageID() instead?
No because a single message with a given message ID...
a) might be received multiple times (some servers send the same message
with different recipients in different sessions)
b) could get split into multiple queues, i.e., this message gets
delivered to devtech.com and lokitech.com, so it gets stored in the
outgoing spool twice, and we'd want to log that devtech.com wasn't
working and not confuse it with the version that went to lokitech.com
just fine. :)
--
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
