----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I favor leaving readers and writers as they are but removing the "ASCII" > > encoding rule for conversion in James code or having a consitent character > > conversion mechanism everywhere over removing Readers and Writers. > > Have you looked at the code to see what happens if you don't specify the > encoding? It doesn't do what you apparently think it does.
Would it make sense to explicitly specify a lossless conversion mechanism for bytes->chars->bytes everywhere James uses Readers/Writers ? Or set such a lossless convertor as the default convertor. bytes->chars->bytes should be consistent across James. Harmeet --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
