You wrote 30 мая 2003 г., 19:19:20: >> I see that speed for list about 1000-2000 users is bigger. I>> f first to process the first part then the second and etc. then the mean >> speed will be the same as for each part. The same for memory.
NJB> With respect to memory, you are mistaken. The location where the memory is NJB> lost is somewhat surprising. sqlResources strings appear to be taking up NJB> all of the memory. There is a separate copy of them for each user mailbox. NJB> The amount of space is directly related to the total number of mailboxes NJB> instantiated, not the number per message. OK. NJB> With respect to getUserByName performance, I believe that you are also NJB> mistaken, but there is a test you can try. Put 25,000 users in the user NJB> repository, but put only 2500 in the list database. If the recipient list NJB> matters, the performance will be 10 messages per second. If the size of the NJB> local repository matters, the performance will be much slower. You're right. I re-tested for 25,000 users in user repository and 2500 in mail list. The delivery speed is less in 3 times. >> That version of MySQL do You use? NJB> 3.23.42 on the test server. NJB> --- Noel NJB> --------------------------------------------------------------------- NJB> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NJB> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, Eugene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
