Kenny wrote:
> I would suggest perhaps changing the error messages. If
> someone is only sending LR instead of CRLF, I think we
> should deny the command, but deny it with an error message
> that tells them they need to use CRLF and gives them a URL
> to learn more (however, that URL should not be the RFC, it
> should be a doc for the unsavvy and the impatient).
I thought I was pretty clear in the error text:
501 Syntax error in parameters or arguments at " + te.position() + ". CR and
LF must be CRLF paired."
Revisions welcomed. In the meantime, I can add a reference to RFC 2821,
section 2.7.1, and clarify it a bit:
"501 Syntax error at character position " + te.position() + ". CR and LF
must be CRLF paired. See RFC 2821 #2.7.1."
Steve Short wrote:
> This is exacly what qmail does, with a reference to the RFC in it.
Really? What version? I thought that the apache server uses qmail, which
is why I tested it. I did not get any error.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
