> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 June 2003 18:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EL for matching
>
>
> Here's something from way in left-field.
>
> I tend to agree with (name I forgot here...sorry) that XML
> shouldn't be
> used for scripting so much, and I'm not sure how you merge the
> configuration needed for mailets and matchers with a
> scripting section.
>
> BUT... what I was going to suggest is what about using EL (defined
> originally in JSTL and now available in commons) as a way to
> the scripting.

More prosiac I admit, but it would be a simple task to add a BSF (Bean
Scripting Framework)interface that supports the creation of matchers and
mailets written in any language which runs on a JVM and understands BSF, see
http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf/index.html.

Supported languages include Jython/Python, Javascript, NetREXX, TCL and a
whole bunch more. It means that James doesn't impose a scripting language,
but provides an interface allowing many to be used.

BSF is out there and widely used. Worth considering?

-- Steve


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to