Vincenzo,
We're talking about the same thing. :-)
My reaction to seeing:
apparentlyTo = new InternetAddress[0];
was that it was a bit of an odd construction, since 99 times out of a 100,
someone would just assign a null.
> I wrote [because] later on the call
>
> setTo(newMail, getTo(originalMail), originalMail);
>
> would behave differently if getTo(originalMail) returned null: in
> this case the TO: value would be the original one (unchanged);
> with an empty array it would, as you said, be converted to null
And my point was that we should explain that so it doesn't get broken in the
future when someone new goes to make changes, and says "Oh, that's odd. We
don't need to create an object. I'll just set this to null."
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
