But, pity that, I could not find a solution as you want (and it's what I want too),
so I wrote my own matcher.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "fractals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 7:35 PM
Subject: still not able to send mail outward


> I think what I am trying to do in very simple and basically everyone should
> be able to do it:
> 
> To avoid relaying I just want mails whose Sender is not a local user to be
> considered as spam. That's all folks !


> <mailet match="RemoteAddrNotInNetwork=127.0.0.1" class="ToProcessor">
>     <processor>spam</processor>
> </mailet>
> Doesn't this mean that the *recipient* is not allowed to be on a remote
> server ? How do local users send mail to the outside world then ? This
> really doesn't make sense to me... I already tried to put ",urbanium.tv.*"
> after the "127.0.0.1" and ",194.183.224.*" which are the 3 first numbers of
> the IP address of my server, all this without much confidence. But anyway
> none worked.
That matching condtion means: if you are connecting from outside the localhost
(of the server resides on), you are going to spam something out.
Anyway, that doesn't make any sense, if you are going to provide services to
people who may send mails via your server from anywhere (even the users
can't make sure if they will have the same IP address as their last dial up).
 
> PLEASE help me on this, I'll be a much more enthusiast James users for the
> advanced capabilities it offers (which is why I *do* want to use it as my
> mail server) when I know my users can use them to send e-mail !!!
I think, with its currently bundled matchers, JAMES just can't do what you want.
You need my AUTH LOGIN solution... ;-)

My modification also provides 8bit-MIME SMTP service extension for passing
8-bit message subjects.

But before I figure out how to make the JAMES core less touched from my
modification, I am not going to contribute it to the JAMES developmenet team...
(and to whom? I just felt a bit confused on Apache's contribution mechanism..)


Reply via email to