>However I wondered if you were using the jdbc:odbc bridge or a full JDBC >driver
As I mentioned, I use 4-type JDBC drivers only. >Serge has replaced some of the avalon classes with new ones of our own to >address these. However as they appear in 2.0a2 then I can only assume that >that is not really relevant. :-( Why not? 2.0a2 is the version I play with... TIA David. > -----Original Message----- > From: David Shpil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:56 PM > To: James User > Subject: Spool manager on M$ SQL > > > Hi, all > > Lately I have started to evaluate James v2.0a2 with M$ SQL sever. > In a production env, I need a mail server to handle large amount of > small ( < 700b) messages. > To test James' behavior under such king of load, I run two threads, > which concurently sending and receiving mail through the server. > > So, here is my problem: > 1. Setting number of threads in spool manager to 1, makes James work > fine with 3-4 messages per second. If I increase message rate the > spool manager becomes overloaded and it takes a lot of time to get > mail delivered to local inbox. > 2. Setting number of threads in spool manager to 2 and more, causes > the following exception to be thrown (Full stack trace is attached) > > java.io.IOException: java.sql.SQLException: Giving up... no connections > available. > > I made the same test with different JDBC drivers: inet, ThinWeb, > jnetdirect; > and I got almost identical results. > > Did any of you ever consider this problem? > Are there any test results available for a comparison? > > > Regards, > > David. > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
