Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 18:41:49, Oki: >I think it would be nicer to stick with one version >of the JVM.
Yes, I agree. >What were your problems with the servlets? It's a whole collection of interdependent servlets. Some of them worked fine, but I had odd behavior. I'm not sure why. Some of the servlets generated "Internal Error 500" with various exceptions. Might have been incompatibilities with the JDBC driver. I dunno. I didn't have time (or energy) to investigate at the time (especially since the system was down, not functioning - I really wish I had an extra machine to do devel./test). >I think installing servlets on Tomcat is not that hard; >all you need is to put the servlets in the >webapps/<yourapp> directory. I agree. It's just that I had some strange problems. >I've found out that using the database repository for >James helps a lot; you can query the outgoing spool >and the individual mailbox easily. To be frank, statements like this kind of make me worried. I mean, the mail system I have in place is funky, but it does work (at the basic stuff anyway). I can appreciate that things such as a DB backend make diagnosing problems much easier. It's just that I don't Want to diagnose problems. I want for there not to be any problems. Unrealistic at this early stage of James? This is why I want to install it in parallel - sort of like it's on a separate machine, except it won't be. Thanks for the feedback. - Jeremy (jeromio.com) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
