Serge, Danny,

Thanks for your precisions.
I will definitely keep the user store and the mail store.


Diego

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Envoye : mardi 28 mai 2002 14:45
A : James Users List
Objet : Re: RE : Minimum James SMTP configuration

Yes, we probably should look into separating this dependency 
(user-store), but like Danny said, you gain almost nothing by removing
them.

Mail-store is required for the SMTP spooler.
-- 
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites
http://www.lokitech.com

Danny Angus wrote:
>>I have tried to do the same with mailstore and users-store, but it
>>doesn't work. I get the following error message:
>>Dependency "users-store" of Block "James" has not been specified.
>>
>>I have removed the "provide" entries that point to users-store from
>>James and smtpserver, but I get the following error message:
>>Dependency for role "org.apache.james.services.UsersStore" not
specified
>>for the Block named "James".
> 
> 
> I'm not quite sure why user-store should be tied into the core of
James this
> way, but I expect there is a reason.
> Mail-store may be needed to allow the spool to function.
> 
> I would stop trying, after all you're going to gain almost nothing by
> removing them.
> d.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to