Thomas,
Ask Danny what he thinks, but I think that 2.1a1 is better than 2.0a3. Lots
of bugs fixes and performance improvements. And there are a few more in the
CVS (I just fixed a bug where if you have a max message size, the exception
handling was broken and the 552 was not being returned). If you do pick up
2.1a1, I'd recommend that you grab that isolated fix from the patch in the
mail archives.
I'm running the current CVS head with some additional fixes not yet present
in the CVS. YMMV.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Jachmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 13:21
To: James Users List
Subject: Re: message size limit
> If you update to the latest release, you should see a huge difference in
> performance. There was a significant change in how the spool is managed.
Hi Noel,
is 2.1a1-2002-08-18 usable in a kind of productive environment? We use JAMES
as our internal mail server.
Regards,
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
