Kaleb,
That's interesting. I'm not observing anything of the sort. I'd definitely like to make sure we don't have a transfer rate problem. If you attempt an upgrade again, could you please capture the logs so we can see the timestamps? Thanks. --Peterb > -----Original Message----- > From: Kaleb Axon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:13 AM > To: James Users List > Subject: Re: Slow transfer rate on POP3 server > > >How are you measuring > > The number I gave was an approximation. I am sending messages of known > length to myself, and measuring the amount of time that Outlook Express's > progress meter shows the "Receiving message" caption (as opposed to > "Connecting," "Receiving list of messages," etc.) Although the number is > not exact, it should be close. > > JAMES 1.2.1 was *much* faster. For example, I can retrieve a 100k message > from JAMES 1.2.1 in under a second, but the same message takes around 8 > seconds from 2.1a1. > > Whether retrieving a single long message or several shorter messages, the > results are pretty similar. > > > >and can you reproduce? > > It happens consistently on one machine. I have not tried to reproduce it > on > others. > > The machine it's happening on is a Pentium 233 with 384MB RAM, running > Windows 2000 and JDK 1.3.1. The problem occurs not only over a network > connection, but also when retrieving the mail on the same machine JAMES is > running on. > > > Kaleb > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
