Install James. Comment out the POP3 and NNTP sections. Leave the SMTP section in and now you've got the equivalent of sendmail. Well, not exactly (not looking for counter-arguments about the available functionality of sendmail), but you'll have what you're looking for.
Dodd ----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:36 AM Subject: RE: using James on Window 2000 > hi, > > > James has documentation about setting up James to use sendmail to route > > message. > > No, the documentation covers configuring sendmail to use James on localhost > to send mail originated by sendmail. > > > But what if I am going to run James on Window 2000, > > which does not > > have sendmail. What can I use to route message? > > James! > > James doesn't *need* sendmail, but people using Linux have sendmail, and > many Linux utilities generate mail using sendmail. > Sendmail will try to send this mail directly to the recipients, Linux users > who've contacted this list often want it sent via James instead. > d. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
