Bill,

Hmmm ... seems to me that such a scheme could be extended nicely to
configure James as a secondary MX for other sites.

Would you like to write this up on the wiki for us?

        --- Noel

-----Original Message-----
From: bill parducci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 11:03
To: James Users List
Subject: Re: james and SMART_HOST (DH)


ok, after much doinking around i believe that i have a workable config
that allows a james server to act as a bidirectional MX (receives mail
on behalf of internal servers and relays mail out for same) without
being a spam ho. i figured that i would post this for reference should
another noob happen along looking for this sort of thing.

notes:
internal server is int.myfoo.com (ip: 192.168.251.204)
below is configuration on MX (ext.myfoo.com)

<!-- the domain that is serviced by the site,
      NOT the server -->
<processor name="transport">
  <mailet match="HostIs=myfoo.com" class="RemoteDelivery">
   <outgoing> file://var/mail/relay/ </outgoing>
   <delayTime> 21600000 </delayTime>
   <maxRetries> 5 </maxRetries>
   <deliveryThreads> 1 </deliveryThreads>
   <gateway> int.myfoo.com </gateway>
   <gatewayPort>25</gatewayPort>
  </mailet>

<!-- remote addresses of internal server(s) -->
  <mailet match="RemoteAddrNotInNetwork=127.0.0.1,192.168.251.204"
class="ToProcessor">
   <processor> spam </processor>
   </mailet>

  <mailet match="All" class="RemoteDelivery">
   <outgoing> file://var/mail/outgoing/ </outgoing>
   <delayTime> 21600000 </delayTime>
   <maxRetries> 5 </maxRetries>
   <deliveryThreads> 1 </deliveryThreads>
  </mailet>
</processor>

thanks all for the assist on this. comments welcome.

b

Danny Angus wrote:
> It might be an idea to use different outgoing repositories, otherwise the
mail you just sorted could get mixed again!
>
> "turning off RemoteAddrNotInNetwork will create open  relay issues"


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to