> | Surely it would be much better, but as you say about the > Norman | system, it > | is be more complex to develop, and could be very OS > dependent. > norman runs on both Unix/WinTel platforms so it shouldn't be > an issue, but yes, this approach would be application > specific (frown) but if it's relatively easy to implement i > don't see that being a problem.
I will have a look on this Norman. > you mention doing a test to see what the cpu load might be - > look also to the time constraint ... Yes > |> as for the file extension mailet, that would be rather > easy; > |> but i am not sure on it's overall usability as it would > need > |> to configured per mailbox. > | Why per mailbox? > as an ISP, the user is the one in control and needs to be > able to decide herself to acept or refuse certain files. i > cannot arbitrarily say that all attachments that match this > mask will be deleted as i would loose business. I understand, you are right from your ISP perspective; my perspective instead is as a company IT department, that can decide a more restrictive policy in order to enforce security: users would easily accept it. Thanks Vincenzo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
