> So we want to see if James is listed in the MX records for > a domain. That would make it easier to configure James. > The lookup will be slower, since it would require a DNS > lookup, but would off-load the administration of the list.
Yes, that is direction I was going. I realize it would take more time so I wanted an explicit Matcher as opposed to changing base functionality. I want a Matcher that examines the MX record(s) of a mail and matches it either the passed parameter, or James - since James may be one of several MX records herself. The secod part of my inquery, was related to the ability of the current resolver to resolve CNAMES. _______________________ thanks, alan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
