Serge Knystautas wrote:
>
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >
> > [many emails of much text]
>
> Ok, well, I really don't get what you *are* proposing. :) In one email
> I see you stating how smtp servlets will act like filters, arguing
> forking is a bad thing (should be T'd from the standard one-to-one
> filtering), etc... Then in another email when someone agrees that
> filtering is the right approach, (I believe) you say they're wrong
> because things have changed since oct '98.
No, didn't say that.
> It sounds like you've had some good thoughts and phone conversations on
> this, and could you put forward a (rough, quick, dirty) design proposal
> as I got lost trying to figure out where we are in reaction to all the
> other suggestions going on. Sorry, but I'm just somewhat confused here.
Plain simple:
1) use mail servlet as the name
2) use the APIs as defined by Pier and I as a starting point,
incorporating the filtering ideas from you and Federico.
3) -1 on forking the mail (also for internet worm problems!)
Hope this was rough, quick and dirty enough :)
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation Conference!
------------------------- http://ApacheCon.Com ---------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
