Mathieu Marache wrote:
>
> Charles Benett wrote:
> >
> > FYI - James 1.2 on Avalon 3.0a4 is in CVS and works but ...
> > 1) logging is messy - this should be fixed next week when Avalon (ie
> > Peter) moves to a 'server archive' structure
> > 2) The diffs between 1.2 and 1.2.1 haven't been transferred.
> > 3) The RDBMS and LDAP classes haven't been transferred.
>
> I maybe could lend a hand on the LDAP transfer... BTW is there any
> unlikly side effects in using the netscape LDAP sdk (gone open with
> Mozilla ?) instead of sun's jndi ?
This is worth investigating - it was on my todo list somewhere.
JNDI, because it is designed to be much more general, may well be much
heavier than we need.
Two questions:
1) What license do they have and is it compatible with Apache?
2) Is there anything netscape directory server specific with their sdk,
or will it be OK with, e.g OpenLDAP etc.
On a practical front, I would wait until the loggin is sorted out,
hopefully a few days. It'll be a lot easier for you to see what is
happening.
Also, see seperate email about user repository.
Charles
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
