Hello!

Óvári <[email protected]> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> If that's useful, it could be added to the Jami documentation.
> https://review.jami.net/c/jami-docs/+/33451

Sorry for not reviewing it earlier myself; it looks good except that I
don't think this will yield a reproducible build as SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
and etc. are not set in this environment, contrary to what happens
during a normal Guix build.

Also, there's a note about
https://qt-project.atlassian.net/browse/QTCREATORBUG-34152, this ended
up being a problem on my side, I think you could now remove that note.

Otherwise it looks good to me, thanks for putting it together!

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Reply via email to