C:\mysource>javac StaticInit4.java
C:\mysource>java StaticInit4
1
j=3
jj=4
3
C:\mysource>java -version
java version "1.1.6"
This is on WinNT 4.0
Jamie
On 15 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> So, I was reading through the chapter on class initialization (to try
> and either fix bernd's static initializer problem or say "it's working
> according to spec, the jdk is busted.") and I've come across one
> example that gives the expected output on japhar and doesn't on the
> JDK.
>
> ----
>
> interface I {
> int i = 1, ii = StaticInit4.out("ii", 2);
> }
>
> interface J extends I {
> int j = StaticInit4.out("j", 3), jj = StaticInit4.out("jj", 4);
> }
>
> interface K extends J {
> int k = StaticInit4.out("k", 5);
> }
>
> class StaticInit4 {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> System.out.println(J.i);
> System.out.println(K.j);
> }
>
> public static int out(String s, int i) {
> System.out.println(s + "=" + i);
> return i;
> }
> }
>
> ----
>
> The expected output (and what japhar produces) is:
> 1
> j=3
> jj=4
> 3
>
> The JDK, however, outputs:
> 1
> ii=2
> j=3
> jj=4
> 3
>
> What I'd like to know is if this test works on any version of the JDK
> (i'm using 1.1.5 here). I'm hoping they've fixed the bug in their
> runtime and aren't going to rewrite the spec to get around it.
>
> Chris
>
