On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Chris Toshok wrote:
> hmm..  even with code that has been verified, you'd need to do at least one
> overflow check - when the method is being called, perhaps...  although that's
> not such a good idea, since the code might never actually make the stack
> overflow.

I think killing the method because its max_stack value is too big, even
though it wouldn't really overflow in practice, is OK.  That's the whole
point of having the max_stack value there...

Reply via email to