On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 12:50 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
> diff --git a/include/vm/class.h b/include/vm/class.h
> index 2ed5ffe..b827afc 100644
> --- a/include/vm/class.h
> +++ b/include/vm/class.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #define _VM_CLASS_H
>
> #include <assert.h>
> +#include <pthread.h>
>
> #include "vm/field.h"
> #include "vm/itable.h"
> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct vm_class {
> * class. */
> uint8_t *static_values;
>
> + pthread_mutex_t static_fixup_mutex;
> struct list_head static_fixup_site_list;
Hmm? Why don't we simply have a ->mutex there to protect all of struct
vm_class? Why do we need to have a separate lock for "fixup_site_list"?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
