Ed Korthof wrote:
> Ack. No one tested this code on a system w/o mmap --
true :-(
> if you look at line
> 386 of jserv_mmap.c, you'll see a function prototype which does not match
> the function prototype in jserv.h.
yes, this was a late change.
> I'm commiting a fix to this to CVS ... btw, _POSIX_MAPPED_FILES is
> probably not the best define to use -- Apache has a define for MMAP
> support (USE_MMAP_FILES), which I'd be more inclined to trust than the
> vendor-supplied define.
Thanks for the pointer.
> ummm ... huh? Why does the installer (configure) put symlinks in, rather
> than copying the files into the apache dir? I thought we'd discussed this
> and decided that actually copying the files was the way to go (since
> people may well nuke the Apache-JServ source directory after it's
> installed & all).
>
> Fyi, Jack, you can fix this simply by editing line 386 of jserv_mmap.c and
> removing the 'request_req' argument to the jserv_setdead function. But
> I can offer you no guarantees as to how well JServ will run on your
> system, as it seems unlikely that it's been QA'ed recently on any system
> w/o mmap. What OS are you running?
There is no probleme running mod_jserv w/o mmap. As the ApJServShmFile has no
default value, commenting this parameter just make your mod_jserv load-balance
and will not use the fail-over part.
> thanks for the bug report --
>
> Ed
>
Thanks ed.
I'm looking at RSE's mm library, and sure we'll use it asap. but the fail-over
part was designed before I ever heard of this library( or maybe it was not
released at that time).
Jean-Luc Rochat
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
READ THE FAQ!!!! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
