-----------------------------
Please read the FAQ!
<http://java.apache.org/faq/>
-----------------------------
In most worlds you can't mount two things at the same point, but I believe
using different mount points would work, instead of
> ApJServMount /servlets ajpv11://localhost:8008/appspace1
> ApJServAction .gsp /servlets/gsp
> ApJServMount /servlets ajpv11://localhost:8009/appspace2
> ApJServAction .gsp /servlets/gsp
use
> ApJServMount /servlets1 ajpv11://localhost:8008/appspace1
> ApJServAction .gsp /servlets1/gsp
> ApJServMount /servlet2 ajpv11://localhost:8009/appspace2
> ApJServAction .gsp /servlets2/gsp
or even better, something descriptive
> ApJServMount /appspace1 ajpv11://localhost:8008/appspace1
> ApJServAction .gsp /appspace1/gsp
> ApJServMount /appspace2 ajpv11://localhost:8009/appspace2
> ApJServAction .gsp /appspace2/gsp
-david
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, James S. Carlson wrote:
> -----------------------------
> Please read the FAQ!
> <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> -----------------------------
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Solaris 2.6.x, Stronghold 2.4.3, Apache-JServ 1.0 (in manual
> mode) on a Sun Enterprise 3500. I'm familiar with the ins-and-outs of
> configuration and setup, and that's all working just fine. Here's my
> question, and I am prescient enough to know what the answer will be:
>
> Is there a way to have more than one zone per vweb?
> i.e.
> <VirtualHost 192.2.3.4:80>
> ApJServMount /servlets ajpv11://localhost:8008/appspace1
> ApJServAction .gsp /servlets/gsp
> ApJServMount /servlets ajpv11://localhost:8009/appspace2
> ApJServAction .gsp /servlets/gsp
> ...
> </VirtualHost>
>
> I can see just by looking at that configuration block that there's no
> way for JServ to know which of those two zones to direct a given servlet
> request to. This is why I have the prescience mentioned above that the
> answer will be "No, not as such." So, is there some kind of workaround?
>
> The reason I ask is, I want to use one SSL cert for many different
> applications, all of which live under the same document root. However,
> these applications will each independently receive such high load that
> it's making a certain amount of sense to me that I have them running in
> separate JVMs, so they won't all be brought down by the crash of any one
> JVM. (This basic assumption, which underlies a great deal of my
> thinking on the subject of high-load servlets, may be wrong.)
>
> Perhaps I have to wait for (or better: help with the development of) the
> "zone sandbox" which is, I believe, a planned future feature?
>
> --
> James S. Carlson
> Manager of Web Development
> AthEnet Data Exchange
> 920-954-9799 x 2902
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
