----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Was there a necessary reason to remove ajpv11 support
from 1.1b2?
Shawn
jon * wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
> and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> on 10/21/99 5:09 PM, Pierpaolo Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Why not? did we removed support for AJPv11 from the 1.1b2 tree???
> >
> > Pier
>
> you can't use 1.0 mod_jserv.c code (ie: AJPv11) to talk to 1.1b2 version of
> the java code.
>
> ajpv11 is removed from the java portion of the 1.1b2 tree, it is not removed
> from the c portion. in other words, with 1.1b2, he could communicate to a
> 1.0 version of the .jar file.
>
> wow...totally confusing...read it a few times before you make a reply. ;-)
>
> -jon
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Shawn McMurdo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lutris Technologies http://www.lutris.com
Enhydra.Org http://www.enhydra.org
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
