----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Urban Widmark wrote:
>
> Are you suggesting that the kernel should make an artificial grouping of
> processes (threads) and call them a process? Maybe it should so that you
> easily can send signals to a process using threads. And doing so would
> probably make pthread implementation easier. I don't think it should just
> to make top/ps happy.
>
What I'm saying (since months now) is that the whole process/thread
model of Linux SUCKS, and should be rewritten from scratch.
> > How many times do I have to say that again and again?
>
> But confusing it is ...
>
But BOOORING.. we have faq-o-matic entries, we covered this topic so
many times on all mailing list, why everyone just seem to ignore all the
resources out there... And we even post on top of every message
----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------
And everytime it gets ignored...
Pier
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
