----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files.  Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------

--- Bruce Butterfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After updating to the latest ApacheJserv 1.1-b3 on
> both my environments
> (RedHat 6.2 and Solaris 7) I'm noticing that each
> request between
> mod_jserv and the servlet engine results in a TCP
> TIME_WAIT state upon
> completion of the request indicating that the socket
> is not being closed
> correctly. Everything functions just fine (requests
> are processed
> correctly) but I end up with a lot of resources
> getting used up for no
> good reason. I'm sure it's something in my
> configuration but the hell if
> I can find it; I've configured many 0.9x versions of
> JServ with no
> problems. I've even commented out the 3 second
> interval PING message in
> java_wrapper_unix.c just to reduce the volume of
> socket errors but
> obviously this is not a solution.
> 


Simple idea, but are you _sure_ you're closing your
sockets every time? I'm not sure I am unless I have a
finally{} block in my servlet.

try {
  // do stuff
} catch( java.io.IOException ex ) {
  // do stuff
  System.err.println("ServletName: "+ex);
} finally {
  // do stuff
  try {
    out.flush();
    out.close();
  } catch(Exception ignore) {}
}


=====
# Nick Bauman
# Technical Programmer
# http://webhelp.com
# real people, real answers, real time
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other:  <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to