----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you will need to worry about the JDK as long as you have the
executables already installed.
Keith Lynn
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Blume, Miriam (Miriam)** CTR ** wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
> and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > >> 2. do nothing for JDK.. somewhere I read that JSDK2.0 already includes
> > it?
> >
> > Not necessarily. The JDK (at least not the one I'm using, which is
> > 1.1.7) does NOT include the JSDK 2.0. At one time, Sun may have planned to
> > include the JSDK in later versions of the JDK. Sun's JDK 1.3 (just
> > released)
> > may include it -- I don't know.
> >
> => what exactly does JDK do? I'm planning on just the upgrade of JServ and
> putting in JSDK2.0... will I have to worry about JDK at all? The documents
> I've read don't indicate that JDK is needed as a pre-requisitite for apache
> upgrades.
>
> Thank you,
> Miriam
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
