----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Solaris VM is *very* stable. Solaris VM crashes are very rare,
JIT or no JIT (and for the record, I haven't heard of any Solaris
bugs specific to the JIT. I think the Linux issues were entirely
separate.)
I'd recommend that you try the most recent JServ. There's been a lot
of work on it.
Regards,
Ben Flaumenhaft
>I would advise turning off the jit. Sun never fixed it for linux, and I
>bet solaris has the same bugs.
>
>Chris Busch wrote:
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>> WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
>> and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Darn it, spoke too soon.
>>
>> GNUJSP: Detected JSDK version 2.0
>> SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
>> si_signo [11]: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
>>
>> I noticed that GNUJSP reports "GNUJSP: Detected JSDK version 2.0" just
>> before this happens...
>>
>> Mmm...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chris Busch
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 7:47 PM
>> To: 'Java Apache Users'
>> Subject: RE: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
>>
>> "You didn't state what jvm you are using. This is obviously caused by
>> the jvm and has nothing to do with jserv."
>>
>> java -version reports
>> java version "1.2.1"
>> Solaris VM (build Solaris_JDK_1.2.1_04, native threads, sunwjit)
>>
>> I could reproduce it by recompiling one of the classes. But when I
>> recompiled everything (since some .class files were still compiled as 1.1.8)
>> and then tried to reproduce the bug, I could not...
>>
>> So I am crossing my fingers ;)
>>
>> --
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Search Archives:
>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
>> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Search Archives:
><http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
>Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search Archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
