----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files.  Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Have You tried flush() -ing the Object Stream ??


Best wishes,
                Andras. 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Briggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 12:58 PM
Subject: JServ's big packets


> 
> I have a servlet that is called by an applet. The servlet then makes a
> socket connection to a server program which feeds the servlet price data
> as and when it becomes available. The servlet then sends this data back
> to the applet via an Object Stream. Initially, I developed this
> application using the Sun JSWDK test engine and it worked fine (until I
> started adding more users and the engine couldn't cope). JServ however
> only sends the data back to the applet once it totals approx 4.2k -
> which is about 65 data updates worth! I need the data updates to go
> straight to the client when the servlet receives them. The servlet is
> receiving the data correctly, and seems to be writing it to the output
> stream to the client correctly. However the data isn't leaving the
> machine until it reaches the magic 4.2k mark (approx 2 and a half HTTP
> packets). Is it JServ or the Apache Web Server that might be causing
> this, and which ever it is, does anyone have any idea how I can fix it
> to suit my situation? I've looked through all the conf and properties
> files for both programs and have the latest versions.
> 




--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search Archives: 
<http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to