Jean-Luc Rochat wrote:
>
> jon * wrote:
> >
> > on 12/12/99 5:21 PM, Damian Fauth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I posted this to this list last week - I think it got swamped by the
> > > noise surrounding Sun's linux JDK announcement.
> > >
> > > If there is to be a 1.1b4 release soon would someone consider these
> > > change requests? They are minor modifications and should not affect the
> > > default behaviour - I just need a developer to run with them, or at
> > > least tell me that they are not a good idea and why ;)
> >
> > sorry, i have been busy. i will try to get them in next week sometime.
> >
> > thx.
> >
> > -jon
>
> I'm going to add it (security.allowedAddresses)(with just a little
> change). Next time use "diff old new" and not the opposite please.
Oops :)
Thanks for this. I notice that JServ.clear() is still private. Is there
a reason for this that I am not aware of?
Think of the following scenario: JServ embedded in some other
application - or called via a wrapper interfacing to something else
(Win32 ServiceControlManager as I want to do). As it is declared private
the wrapper or calling application cannot shutdown JServ without calling
JServ.terminate() which is protected and eventually calls System.exit()
which of course kills the calling process. JServ.clear() needs at least
to be declared protected
Thanks,
Damian
--
Damian Fauth Fairfax Interactive Network (F2)
Senior Software Engineer 201 Sussex Street
Ph: +61 2 9282 3528 Sydney NSW 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.f2.com.au
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
