[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16635456#comment-16635456
]
Eliran Mesika commented on AXIS-2307:
-------------------------------------
i manage to overcome the issue in 1.4 version by creating JavaBeanWriter.java
and override writeSimpleConstructors function.
Note : i needed to add string constructor only for token type
protected void writeSimpleConstructors() {
// If this is a simple type,need to emit a string
// constructor and a value construtor.
if (!type.isSimpleType())
return;
pw.println(" // " + Messages.getMessage("needStringCtor"));
// Simple types without simpleValueTypes are derived classes.
// Inherit the simple constructor.
if (simpleValueTypes.size() == 0) {
if (extendType != null) {
// Find the java type of the most base type.
TypeEntry baseType = type;
while (true) {
TypeEntry superType = SchemaUtils.getBaseType(baseType,
emitter.getSymbolTable());
if (superType == null)
break;
else
baseType = superType;
}
String baseJavaType = baseType.getName();
pw.println(" public " + className + "(" + baseJavaType
+ " _value) {");
pw.println(" super(_value);");
pw.println(" }");
pw.println();
// This relevant part created in Surecomp to fix axis 1.4 problem creating
String constructor for PKO Token type like CurrencyCodeDict
if (baseJavaType.equals("org.apache.axis.types.Token")) {
pw.println(" // this constructor create manually by me to avoid missing
String constructor" );
pw.println(" public " + className
+ "(java.lang.String _value ) {");
pw.println(" super(_value);");
pw.println(" }");
pw.println();
}
}
} else if (isUnion()
|| simpleValueTypes.get(0).equals("java.lang.String")) {
pw.println(" public " + className
+ "(java.lang.String _value) {");
pw.println(" this._value = _value;");
pw.println(" }");
int i = 0;
for (Iterator iterator = simpleValueTypes.iterator(); iterator
.hasNext();) {
String typeName = (String) iterator.next();
if (typeName.equals("java.lang.String")) {
i += 2;
continue;
}
String capName = "_value";
if (isUnion()) {
// names and simpleValueTypes should match as
// union is over simple types
String name = (String) names.get(i + 1);
capName = Utils.capitalizeFirstChar(name);
}
pw.println(" public " + className + "(" + typeName
+ " _value) {");
pw.println(" set" + capName + "(_value);");
pw.println(" }");
pw.println();
i += 2;
}
} else if (simpleValueTypes.size() == 1) {
pw.println(" public " + className + "("
+ simpleValueTypes.get(0) + " _value) {");
pw.println(" this._value = _value;");
pw.println(" }");
pw.println(" public " + className
+ "(java.lang.String _value) {");
writeSimpleTypeGetter((String) simpleValueTypes.get(0), null,
"this._value =");
pw.println(" }");
pw.println();
}
}
> wsdl2java does no longer generate Java classes for simple WSDL types
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIS-2307
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2307
> Project: Axis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.2, 1.2.1, 1.3
> Environment: Windows XP, BEA Weblogic, Java 1.4
> Reporter: Matthias Burbach
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: 18Nov05.wsdl, test.wsdl
>
>
> I observed that in contrast to Axis 1.1 wsdl2java does no longer generate
> Java classes for simple WSDL types in Axis 1.2 and above anymore.
> For example, my WSDL contains the following type definition:
> <xs:simpleType name="anrede">
> <xs:restriction base="xs:int">
> <xs:minInclusive value="0">
> </xs:minInclusive>
> <xs:maxInclusive value="2">
> </xs:maxInclusive>
> </xs:restriction>
> </xs:simpleType>
> wsdl2java of Axis 1.1 generated a Java class Anrede.java from this bit.
> Axis 1.1 XML requests referencing this type look as follows (extraction):
> <anrede xsi:type="n1:anrede">0</anrede>
> wsdl2java of Axis 1.2, however does **not** generated a Java class
> Anrede.java from this bit.
> Axis 1.2 XML requests, on the contrary, referencing this type look as follows
> (extraction): <anrede xsi:type="xsd:int">0</anrede>
> This difference causes the server I sent such requests to to reject requests
> of the latter kind:-(
> Consequently, I seem to face a serious interoperability problem due to the
> upgrade from Axis 1.1 to Axis 1.2. The problem remains when using Axis 1.2.1
> or Axis 1.3.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
