[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPART-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thilina Buddhika resolved RAMPART-236.
--------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.6.0

This has been fixed in the trunk as well as in the 1_6 branch. When there is an 
error thrown from the service, it is properly communicated to client as a SOAP 
Fault. 

If it is a service fault, then it should be secured. But for parameter based 
configurations, it is required to include the corresponding handlers in the 
in-fault-flow and out-fault-flow which should be included by default.

> Error in service method is not properly handled for parameter based 
> WS-Security (issue in RampartReceiver??)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RAMPART-236
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPART-236
>             Project: Rampart
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: rampart-core
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>         Environment: Axis2 1.4, Rampart 1.4, Tomcat 5.0, JDK 1.5, Windows XP
>            Reporter: Chinmoy Chakraborty
>            Assignee: Thilina Buddhika
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>         Attachments: rampart_debug.log
>
>
> For parameterbased ws-security enabled services, in normal cases when there 
> is no error at the time of invocation (invocation of business logic) of the 
> service, it works fine. So far so good. Now when some error happens at the 
> time of service invocation it does not return SOAP fault back. 
> I guess this a bug in RampartReceiver/(RampartSender?). Please find 
> rampart_debug.log. See at line 801.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to