I'd think that the benefits of moving to Java 6 are minor at best, and
while most users won't care about the loss of Java 5 support there are
probably a significant number who will. Andreas' earlier suggestion of a
Maven profile sounds like it gives a nice way of selectively updating to
dependencies that require Java 6 without moving the rest of the code to
Java 6.

  - Dennis

Dennis M. Sosnoski
Java SOA and Web Services Consulting <http://www.sosnoski.com/consult.html>
Axis2/CXF/Metro SOA and Web Services Training
<http://www.sosnoski.com/training.html>
Web Services Jump-Start <http://www.sosnoski.com/jumpstart.html>


On 03/14/2011 05:50 AM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
> Oracle will not release any new version of their _free-of-charge_ Java
> 1.5 distribution. That doesn't apply to their commercial offering and
> also doesn't apply to other vendors. E.g. WebSphere 6.1 (the last
> remaining version that uses Java 1.5) will only reach end of service
> in late 2012.
>
> There was a similar discussion recently in the CXF project. They
> concluded that it is too early to drop 1.5 support:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04370.html
>
> I think most of the arguments also apply to Axis2.
>
> Andreas
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 13:49, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> I believe Oracle will not release any new JDK 1.5 version to fix security
>> issues such
>> as http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/07/java_denial_of_service_bug/
>> A JDK 1.6 release was provided a few days after the bug was made public.
>> However, they have made a patching tool
>> available 
>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alert-cve-2010-4476-305811.html
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Andreas Veithen <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>     
>>> I think that the question is not asked in the right way. It's not an
>>> all-or-nothing thing. We can easily set up a Maven profile so that the
>>> clustering module is skipped if the build is run on Java 1.5. This
>>> allows us to remain compatible with Java 1.5 for the rest of the
>>> framework. We only need to update the release procedure to make sure
>>> that the release build is done using Java 1.6, so that the clustering
>>> stuff is included in the binary distributions. It's pretty much the
>>> same approach that was used for the JAXB2 and JAX-WS support up to
>>> Axis2 1.4.x.
>>>
>>> Note that for many people, upgrading to Java 1.6 represents a huge
>>> effort because it requires an upgrade of the application server on
>>> which they deploy their applications. At this point, I don't see
>>> enough added value that would justify to make this mandatory for the
>>> entire Axis2 stack.
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:56, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Thoughts on $subject please. I had to revert a useful Apache Tribes
>>>> upgrade
>>>> since Tomcat no longer supports Java 5.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Afkham Azeez
>>>> Senior Software Architect & Senior Manager; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com,
>>>>
>>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>>>> email: [email protected] cell: +94 77 3320919
>>>> blog: http://blog.afkham.org
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez
>>>> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
>>>>
>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>       
>>
>>
>> --
>> Afkham Azeez
>> Senior Software Architect & Senior Manager; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com,
>>
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>> email: [email protected] cell: +94 77 3320919
>> blog: http://blog.afkham.org
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez
>> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
>>
>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>>     
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>   

Reply via email to