[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13109339#comment-13109339
]
Tammo van Lessen commented on AXIS2-948:
----------------------------------------
David, it would probably satisfy my personal use case, as long as the anonymous
constraints are covered by that implementation as well.
>From a conceptual point of view however, I think Axis2 should either fully
>support ws-addr-wsdl or not at all. Currently it supports only
>wsaw:usingAddressing but not the constraints to steer the single/dual channel
>behavior, so it provides a partial implementation, which is IMO the worst
>option. If I'm not mistaken both specs provide different ways to the same
>behavior, so from a framework perspective I would vote for supporting both
>(like e.g. both WS-A versions are supported) to reach a broader audience.
>From the non-framework but conceptual point of view I of course also prefer
>the WS-Policy variant because it follows the WS architecture principles, but
>as you know, defining policies is not as easy and mostly also not as explicit
>as it could be done with explicit flags. That's why I would prefer to support
>both options. Looks like JAXWS RI is also supporting both [1]
[1]
http://jax-ws.java.net/nonav/2.2.1/docs/wsaddressing.html#Describing_WS_Addressing_in_WSDL
> Extract and support wsaw:Anonymous values
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIS2-948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-948
> Project: Axis2
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Addressing
> Reporter: David Illsley
> Assignee: David Illsley
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
