Bump! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3219 still exists. All I'm asking for is to re-open it. It can be verified and fixed later.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 20:02, Yashwanth Rajaram -X (yrajaram - ZENSAR TECHNOLOGIES INC at Cisco) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tammo, > > I had faced some issue when using local transport and later I figured > out how to use it. Maybe it is all about how to use it. I had posted my > findings which you can see in the archived mail thread here: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/axis-java-user/201107.mbox/%3C9 > c3b47f84c2f814da02f301c0158838a03fd6...@xmb-sjc-222.amer.cisco.com%3E > > Here is a gist: > I tried to use org.apache.axis2.integration.LocalTestCase.java (which is > used by Axis for Unit Tests). I bundled this along with my code and > called getClient(serviceName, OperationName) method on it. But when > executing my code it was unable to resolve the service... I had > accessed the service in this format "local://services/MyService"... > > Later I figured out that the following call does not work as desired > (which is the cause for not finding the service), so I changed it as I > have shown below: > > ConfigurationContext ctx = > ConfigurationContextFactory.createConfigurationContextFromFileSystem(nul > l, null); > > So I had to supply the parameters (see below) to get this to work as > desired: > > ConfigurationContext ctx = > ConfigurationContextFactory.createConfigurationContextFromFileSystem(Rep > ositoryPath, AxisXML); > > > thanks, > -- > Yashwanth > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tammo van Lessen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 2:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: NPE in LocalTransportReceiver.processMessage() > > Hi devs, > > can someone please review and re-open AXIS2-3219? I added detailed > informations about the problem and two suggestions for potential fixes. > It can be fixed by a single parameter passing change. I'm happy to > provide a patch as well, but would like know which solution better fix > into Axis2's design. > > It is a bit frustrating to see it as 'Resolved' without neither a single > change associated to it nor does it seem the issue has been properly > reviewed. > > A code review, especially regarding the use of static fields in this > context, would do it good. > > Thanks, > Tammo > > PS: Sorry for the rant, besides of that, Axis is great stuff :) > > -- > Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
