AravindPS created RAMPART-380:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Axis2/Rampart Secure Conversation Inter-operability With 
.NET client
                 Key: RAMPART-380
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPART-380
             Project: Rampart
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: rampart-core, rampart-integration, rampart-policy
    Affects Versions: 1.6.0
         Environment: Windows 7 Enterprise Service pack 1, jboss-5.1.0.GA, 
axis2-1.5.5 (exploded war), rampart-1.6.0
            Reporter: AravindPS


  We have built web service using Axis2 1.5.5 / Rampart 1.6.0. We are 
supporting the WS-Security authentication mechanisms. We have a service which 
implements the ws-secure conversation authentication. We are trying to test the 
inter-operability of this service with .Net client. 
  We are facing some issues regarding this. 
  We have taken help of microsoft support and have tweaked the policy at the 
.Net side to sync with the ws-secure conversation policy at the rampart server 
side. But even after this, we are getting the error. Let me know if 
inter-operability with .Net is possible and if yes let us know how to solve 
this issue.
  I have attached the axis2 logs. 
  I suspect the issue is that the .Net client is not able to consume the 
response sent from STS (sct-issuer-config) (the RSTR action) because of policy 
mismatch and also the fact that we have not specified any policy to be adhered 
to by the response action RSTR. Can we give a policy for "sct-issuer-config"?

  I have attached relevant log files.
  Let me know if you need further details.

Aravind


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to