Hi devs, Can i assume nobody has problem with this procedure and ok with using JSR 353 for this implementations? If so i would like to open a new JIRA issue for this and working on this.
Regards, Shameera. On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Sagara Gunathunga < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> Currently newly added JSON XML Stream API base approach in trunk, >>> tightly couple with google-gson. I think it is good to have flexibility to >>> use other JSON Stream APIs(like Jakson) with this. >>> >> >> Good point but IMHO we should use JSR 353 (Java API for JSON processing >> ) which being more or less finalized by now for above task. >> > > +1 , Yes that would be good to use standard API, > > Regards, > Shameera. > >> >> [1] - http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=353 >> >> Thanks ! >> >> >>> >>> Here we can use factory method pattern to create JSON >>> XMLStreamReaders/writers . And we can provide an api to implement Gson, >>> Jakson or any other Json Stream support api to write the logic under that. >>> >>> we can provide Factory classes to create JSONXMLStreamReaders/Writers >>> with Gson or Jakson or other. >>> >>> Thoughts are welcome. >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Shameera Rathnayaka. >>> >>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sagara Gunathunga >> >> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com >> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/ >> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Shameera Rathnayaka. > > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/ > -- Best Regards, Shameera Rathnayaka. Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
