[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15409566#comment-15409566
]
Shawn Lavelle commented on AXIS-2383:
-------------------------------------
[~wdeng] Can this be closed?
> Is this a serialization bug introduced in axis 1.3?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIS-2383
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2383
> Project: Axis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Serialization/Deserialization
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: Dell Station, W2000, WSAD 5.1.2, Websphere
> Reporter: Weian Deng
> Assignee: Jongjin Choi
> Priority: Critical
>
> We are working in a project that try to migrate our
> web services from axis 1.1 to axis 1.3 where we found
> a potential bug in SerializationContext that is
> introduced after axis 1.2.
> Given the following scenario:
> 1. Define a complex type AbstractType,
> 2. Define two complex types ConcretType1 and
> ConcretType2 which extend type AbstractType
> 3. Define complex type D that contains an element E of
> type AbstractType
> E can be assigned an element of type ConcretType1 or
> ConcretType2.
> Serializing an Object of type D that contains an
> element E of type ConcretType1 should use the
> serializer for ConcretType1 to serialize element E.
> This is the behavior on axis 1.1. But Axis 1.3 uses
> the serializer for AbstracType to do the serialization
> which I think is a bug.
> Or, is there any setup parameter that can change this
> serialization behaviors?
> After checking the source code of
> SerializationContext. 1.3 introduced a new method
> getActualClass(). The logic there doesn't take care
> of the case that if clz is a sub-class of javaType, we
> should return clz.
> private Class getActualJavaClassBug(QName xmlType,
> Class javaType, Object obj) {
> Class cls = obj.getClass();
>
> if ((xmlType != null
> &&
> Constants.isSchemaXSD(xmlType.getNamespaceURI()) &&
> "anyType".equals(xmlType.getLocalPart()))
> || (javaType != null
> && (javaType.isArray() ||
> javaType ==
> Object.class))) {
> return cls;
> }
>
> if (javaType != null && cls != javaType &&
> !cls.isArray()) {
> return javaType;
> }
>
> return cls;
> }
> Should the second if statement rewrite as follows:
> if (javaType != null &&
> !(javaType.isAssignableFrom(cls)) && !cls.isArray())
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
