DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-05 23:49 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Here is what I think happened and, if so, the correct fix: > 1. MultiPhraseQuery and the new BooleanQuery were both added in parallel to > Wolf's work. We now have a merge conflict. > 2. The addition of the throws IOException to these two classes is now > required for Weights, and so the change is correct. It could well be that there is a conflict with the new BooleanQuery and BooleanScorer. Given the backward compatibility goal of this new code, I'd be happy to resolve that possible conflict. Over the last months, I have kept all the changes to BooleanQuery/BooleanScorer in a local working copy, and I had only one or two conflicts. These were very easy to resolve. Bugzilla works well in this respect: all changes have some comments associated with them, and, from what I have read so far, there are no conflicting intentions for the functionality of this code. So, please go ahead as you see fit for the MultiSearcher. I think you can safely ignore evt. conflicts with new code for BooleanQuery/BooleanScorer. Regards, Paul Elschot -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
