DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34477>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34477 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-19 02:57 ------- > This is difficult to debug without warnings I think these types of checks should be done in a separate place (or at least be optional somehow). There are many other potential problems than sorting on a field that doesn't exist... but all developers shouldn't have to pay the price in overhead or lack of flexibility. How about a checkQuery() or a debugQuery() that could check for things like: - searching on a non-indexed field - sorting on a non-indexed field - documents that have multiple terms for the sort field - documents matching a query that have no term for the sort field -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
