Daniel Naber wrote:
What do you think? If this gets accepted, it also needs a better name.
It looks reasonable to me.
As for names, IndexWriter would be a good one for this, and
IndexAppender would be a better name for what's now called IndexWriter.
Unfortunately, I don't see a way to make that change back-compatibly.
So perhaps this could be called IndexModifier.
We could still rename IndexWriter to IndexAppender and add a deprecated
subclass named IndexWriter for back-compatibility. Would that work? Is
it worth it?
Doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]