Daniel Naber wrote:
What do you think? If this gets accepted, it also needs a better name.

It looks reasonable to me.

As for names, IndexWriter would be a good one for this, and IndexAppender would be a better name for what's now called IndexWriter. Unfortunately, I don't see a way to make that change back-compatibly.

So perhaps this could be called IndexModifier.

We could still rename IndexWriter to IndexAppender and add a deprecated subclass named IndexWriter for back-compatibility. Would that work? Is it worth it?

Doug

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to