DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35518>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35518 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-28 09:20 ------- (In reply to comment #3) ... > Going forward I think it would be useful to try retain some of the features of > the existing highlighter (eg IDF weighted fragment scoring, fragSizes defined > in bytes) and merge with your phrase-highlighting features.Adding span query > support would be good too. What I'm less clear on right now is how this is best > achieved. Given the possibility of nested span queries, it might be best do this is by reindexing the field to be highlighted in ram, reuse the span query on it for collecting the Spans (via getSpans()) and use the beginnings and the ends from this spans as the basis for highlighting. For efficiency during reindexing the analyzer used to assemble the lucene document could ignore all tokens that will not match, except for their positions. Regards, Paul Elschot -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
