DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35838>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35838 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Java NIO patch against |Java NIO patch against |Lucene 1.9 |Lucene 1.9 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-26 15:27 ------- (In reply to comment #0) I've attached an improved NioFile and caching mechanism. One of the problems with the earlier implementation was that the cache size could grow enemorous (since it was a certain percentage of all outstanding segements). The attached cache is shared by all segments and has an upper bound. As a note, your performance improvement numbers do not jive with what I have seen. How many simultaneous threads are you using? What was the cache size? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
