Sure. I have noticed that Lucene uses certain programming style which is not usual. I believe, that there are some reasons for this style, so I would like to discuss the reasons with the author(s) first, rather than blindly add g/setters, remove final keywords, add empty constructors, create factories following desing patters, extract interfaces and so on.
Maros. -----Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ----- >To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >From: Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 17.08.2005 20:32 >Subject: Re: lucene API > >On Wednesday 17 August 2005 15:26, Maros Ivanco wrote: > >> I would personally prefer the third one, but only if the changes >will >> make it to the official release. > >Whether a patch is accepted can obviously only be decided when we see >the >patch, so no promises can be made. > >Regards > Daniel > >-- >http://www.danielnaber.de > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
