How about setting some preliminary due dates, so that things don't just hang there.
ray, On 10/15/05, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Re Votes - yes, please use that feature to help prioritize. > > Otis > > --- Ray Tsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ah I see it. Should we start assigning and voting for issues that > > should make it into the 1.9 release? Maybe set a due date for > > submitting these 1.9-bound issues, a week for voting and review, and > > then allocate time for applying the patches. I can't wait to see an > > officially released 1.9! > > > > Also, I think Jira can make a distinction between released and > > unreleased versions? > > > > ray, > > > > On 10/15/05, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 14, 2005, at 11:06 PM, Ray Tsang wrote: > > > > Can we add a 1.9 release to the roadmap? or start a 1.9 release > > > > tracker issue? > > > > > > If you mean the ability to log issues on JIRA for 1.9, I created > > that > > > several weeks ago. Let me know if something still isn't right. > > > > > > Erik > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
