[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-442?page=comments#action_12344241 ]
Daniel Naber commented on LUCENE-442: ------------------------------------- Hoss, how exactly did the test fail, what was the real number and what was the expected number? I must admit I don't understand your scenario. The test happens only at the end, on an optimized index. We start two threads on an empty index. Both threads randomly add and delete documents and remember the number of documents added and deleted. At the end, when both threads are finished, the index should contain this many documents: # added by thread 1 + # added by thread 2 - # deleted by thread 1 - # deleted by thread 2 This is how I understand it. Maybe you could rephrase your scenario? Regards Daniel > TestIndexModifier.testIndexWithThreads is not valid? > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-442 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-442 > Project: Lucene - Java > Type: Bug > Components: Search > Versions: 1.9 > Reporter: Hoss Man > > I recently started playing with the trunk of SVN, and noticed that > intermitently, TestIndexModifier.testIndexWithThreads (revision 292010) would > fail. > The basic premise of the test seems to be that 3 pairs of IndexThread > instances can be started in parallel, each pair using the same instance of > IndexModifier to concurrently and randomly add/delete/optimize a single > FSDirectory index. > The test is considered a success if the sum of additions-deletions recorded > by each pair of threads equals the final docCount() for the IndexModifier > instance used by that pair of threads. > Now I freely admit that I'm not 100% familiar with the code for > IndexModifier, but at a glance, the basic premise seems to be: > a) If method for IndexWriter is called, open it if needed, close the > IndexReader first if needed. > b) if method for IndexReader is called, open it if needed, close the > IndexWriter first if needed. > If I'm understnading that correctly, I see no reason to assume this test will > pass. > It seems like there could be plenty of scenerios in which the number of > additions-deletions != docCount(). The most trivial example I can think of is: > 1) the first IndexThread instance which has a chance to run adds a > document, and optimizes before any other IndexThreads ever open the Directory. > 2) a subsequent pair of IndexThread instances open their IndexModifier > instance before any documents are deleted. > 3) the IndexThread instances from #2 do nothing but add documents > ...that pair of IndexThreads is now garunteed to have recorded a differnet > number of additions then the docCount returned by their IndexModifier. > Am I missing something, or should this test be removed? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
