[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-469?page=all ]
     
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-469:
---------------------------------

    Fix Version: 1.9
     Resolution: Fixed
      Assign To: Yonik Seeley

Fixed a small bug in the test (passing a null analyzer which causes a NPE with 
the new getPositionIncrement code), and committed.

Thanks Luke!

> (Parallel-)MultiSearcher: using Sort object changes the scores
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: LUCENE-469
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-469
>      Project: Lucene - Java
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: Search
>     Versions: CVS Nightly - Specify date in submission
>  Environment: 21 november 2005, revision 345901
>     Reporter: Luc Vanlerberghe
>     Assignee: Yonik Seeley
>      Fix For: 1.9
>  Attachments: MultiSearcherSort.patch, MultiSearcherSort.patch, 
> TestMultiSearcher.patch
>
> Example: 
> Hits hits=multiSearcher.search(query);
> returns different scores for some documents than
> Hits hits=multiSearcher.search(query, Sort.RELEVANCE);
> (both for MultiSearcher and ParallelMultiSearcher)
> The documents returned will be the same and in the same order, but the scores 
> in the second case will seem out of order.
> Inspecting the Explanation objects shows that the scores themselves are ok, 
> but there's a bug in the normalization of the scores.
> The document with the highest score should have score 1.0, so all document 
> scores are divided by the highest score.  (Assuming the highest score was>1.0)
> However, for MultiSearcher and ParallelMultiSearcher, this normalization 
> factor is applied *per index*, before merging the results together (the merge 
> itself is ok though).
> An example: if you use
> Hits hits=multiSearcher.search(query, Sort.RELEVANCE);
> for a MultiSearcher with two subsearchers, the first document will have score 
> 1.0.
> The next documents from the same subsearcher will have decreasing scores.
> The first document from the other subsearcher will however have score 1.0 
> again !
> The same applies for other Sort objects, but it is less visible.
> I will post a TestCase demonstrating the problem and suggested patches to 
> solve it in a moment...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to