[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-486?page=comments#action_12362397 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-486: ---------------------------------------- I am not happy with the replication thing, but if you can't build something in the main source tree without having the "demo" code then that just doesn't feel right. What happens when someone changes the demo? Now we have to keep this demo code exactly the same lest we also want to update the dependencies in the main source as well. I suppose it isn't a big deal since it is only one file, but it just seems like an unnecessary dependency. Ideally, the FileDocument would live in some common place, but I am not sure where that would be. I don't include the demo source under my source tree in intellij, so it always complains at me (I hate those red squiggly marks), but I suppose I can get over it for this one file. > Core Test should not have dependencies on the Demo code > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-486 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-486 > Project: Lucene - Java > Type: Test > Versions: 1.4 > Reporter: Grant Ingersoll > Priority: Minor > Attachments: FileDocument.java, testdoc.patch > > The TestDoc.java Test file has a dependency on the Demo FileDocument code. > Some of us don't keep the Demo code around after downloading, so this breaks > the build. > Patch will be along shortly -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
